CROSSING OVER NEVELSKI STRAIT: POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
Abstract
Continuing research that has been conducted by Russian leading transport universities for many years on prospects of development of railways and roads of eastern direction [1] in Russia, the authors propose a solution to the problem of transport crossing over
Nevelski Strait from the mainland to the island of Sakhalin. Options and approaches are justified, the alternative «bridge-tunnel» is evaluated, suggesting projects with a high degree of engineering elaboration, environmental safety, economic readiness and investment responsibility.
About the Authors
V. M. KruglovRussian Federation
Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT), Moscow, Russia.
E. N. Kurbatskiy
Russian Federation
Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT), Moscow, Russia
V. R. Hoppe
Russian Federation
Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT), Moscow, Russia.
A. A. Tomilov
Russian Federation
Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT), Moscow, Russia.
References
1. Kopylenko, V. A., Bykov, Yu. A., Kruglov, V.M., Turbin, I. V., Kosmin, YV. The northern and eastern regions of Russia - a major polygonfor expansion of the country's railway network in XXI century [Severnye i Vostochnye rqjony Rossii -vazhnejshij poligon rasshirenija seti zhelezfiyh dorog strany vXXI veke]. Transportnoe stroitel'stvo, 2008, Iss. 4,pp. 2—4.
2. Development of science-based proposals for enhancing the competitiveness of the international transport corridor «Transsiberian» in the direction Europe—Russia—Japan with an estimate of the possible use of Sakhalin island and engineering possibility of construction of transport crossings over Nevelski Strait and La Perouse Strait: research report [Raz/abotka nauchno obosnovannyh predlozhenij v oblasti povyshenija konkurentosposobnosti mezhdunarodnogo transportnogo koridora «Transsib» v napravlenii Evropa-Rossija—Japonija s ocenkoj vozmozhnogo ispol'zovanija territorii ostmvaSahaliniinzhenemo-tehnicheskojvozjnozhnostisoz.danija transportnyh perehodov cherez proliv Nevel'skogo i proliv Laperuza: otchet о NIR]. Institute of Economy and Transport Development, Institute «Giprostroymost»; guided by Pekhterev, F.S.; executed by Sharapov, S.N. et al. Moscow, 2012, reg. number 01201282379.
3. The Messina Strait Bridge: A challenge and a dream. Brancaleoni, Fabioetal. Strettodi Messina S.pA; CRCPress: ABalkemaBook, Rome, Italy, 2010, 324p.
4. SP 122.13330.2012: rail and road tunnels. The updated edition of SNiP [Russian construction rules and regulations] 32-04-97 ]SP 122.13330.2012: Tonneliz.helez.nodoroz.hnye i avtodorozhnye. Aktualizirovannaja redakcija SNiP 32-04-97]. Moscow, 2012.
5. SP 14.13330.2014: Constructionin seismic regions. The updated edition of SNIP [Russian construction rules and regulations] II-7-81* [SP 14.13330.2014: Stroitel'stvo v sejsmicheskih rajonah. Aktualizirovannaja redakcija SNiPII- 7-81*]. Moscow, 2014.
6. Kurbatskiy E. N. Advantages of immersed tube tunnels in the construction of transport crossings over extendedt water (sea) obstacles [Preimushhestva tonnelej iz opusknyh sekcij pri soomzheniitransportnyh perehodov cherezprotjazhjonnye vodnye (morskie)pregrady]. Metro itonnett, 2014, Iss. 4, pp. 41—50.
7. Kurbatskiy, Evgeny N., Nguyen, VanHuhg. Transport Immersed Tube Tunnels. World of Transport and Transportation, Vol. 12, 2014, Iss. 6, pp. 160-173.
8. De Wit, J.C.W.M., Van Putten, E. Immersed Tunnels: Competitive tunnel technique for long (sea) crossings. Under City 2012 Dubrovnik, April 12-14, 2012. http:// tec-tunnel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/UC2012-paper-immersed-tunnel-De-Wit.PDF.pdf. Last accessed 4.07.2015.
Review
For citations:
Kruglov V.M., Kurbatskiy E.N., Hoppe V.R., Tomilov A.A. CROSSING OVER NEVELSKI STRAIT: POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS. World of Transport and Transportation. 2015;13(4):44-53.
Views:
318
Email this article 