CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PRIORITIES OF THE RAILWAY INDUSTRY: GLOBAL EXPERIENCES
https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2019-17-5-16-37
Abstract
Critical technologies constitute key elements of any corporate development strategy for building an effective long-term research and technology system. The objective of the article is to analyze critical technologies in the system of science and technology priorities of railway companies. Besides describing the approaches to interpretation of the concept of «critical technology», the research based on the instruments of Gartner hype cycle, content analysis, case study, analyzes examples of the most significant cases of implementation of critical technologies in railway companies, reveals clusters of the most demanded critical technologies that can dramatically change the railway industry in the medium and long term. Those technologies comprise automation and mechanization of production processes; high-speed passenger and cargo transportation; resource, safety, risk and reliability management at all stages of the life cycle of railway transport facilities and infrastructure; development of transport and logistics systems within the single transport and information space; organisation of heavy haul cargo transportation.
The results confirm the need for regular monitoring and improving efficiency of organisation of technological (innovation) activity of railway companies in order to maintain their leading positions in terms of competitiveness.
The results confirm the need for regular monitoring and improving efficiency of organisation of technological (innovation) activity of railway companies in order to maintain their leading positions in terms of competitiveness.
About the Authors
M. M. Zheleznov
Moscow State (National Research) University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D.Sc. (Eng), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Information Systems, Technologies and Automation in Civil Engineering
Moscow
O. I. Karasеv
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D. (Economics), Director of the Center for Science and Technology Forecasting of the Faculty of Economics
Moscow
S. S. Trostyansky
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Master in Economics, Deputy Director of the Center of Storage and Analysis of Big Data
Moscow
E. A. Shitov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Master in Management, leading specialist of the Center of Storage and Analysis of Big Data
Moscow
References
1. Fagerberg, J. Technology and competitiveness. Oxford review of economic policy, 1996, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 39–51. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/12.3.39.
2. Louvet, J. P. Les principaux résultats de l’étude «Technologies clés 2005». Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie de la Répubique Française, Paris, 2000. [Электронный ресурс]: https://archives.entreprises.gouv.fr/2012/www.industrie.gouv.fr/infopres/presse/si_tech3.html.
3. Rapport public. Technologies clés 2010. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie de la Répubique Française, Direction générale des Entreprises, 2006. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/28624-technologies-cles‑2010.
4. Rapport public. Technologies clés 2015. Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie de la Répubique Française, 2011. [Электронные ресурсы]: https://www.viepublique.fr/rapport/31652-technologies-cles‑2015; http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapportspublics/114000139.pdf.
5. Соколов А. В. Метод критических технологий // Форсайт. – 2007. – Т. 1. – № 4. – С. 64–74.
6. Шашнов С. А., Позняк А. Ю. Научно-технологические приоритеты для модернизации российской экономики // Форсайт. – 2011. – Т. 5. – № 2. – С. 48–56.
7. Данилин И. В., Мамедяров З. А., Кобринская И. Я. Прогнозирование технологических тенденций на основе социально-экономических факторов // М.: Национальный исследовательский институт мировой экономики и международных отношений им. Е. М. Примакова Российской академии наук, 2016. – 21 с. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/Projects/ONI/2016/2016-DYNKIN-REPRFFI‑001.pdf. Доступ 21.10.2019.
8. Бойченко А. В., Корнеев Д. Г., Казаков В. А., Лукинова О. В. Инжиниринг предприятий на основе технологий интернета вещей // Инжиниринг предприятий и управление знаниями (ИП&УЗ‑2017): Сб. науч. трудов XX юбилейной Всероссийской научной конференции. 26–28 апреля 2017 г. / Под науч. ред. Ю. Ф. Тельнова: в 2 т. – М.: РЭУ им. Г. В. Плеханова, 2017. – Т. 1. – 452 с. – С. 218–224.
9. Кононов В. Н., Замбржицкая Е. С., Дема Р. Р., Харченко М. В. Управление жизненными циклами промышленных технологий // Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Экономика». – 2018. – № 1. – С. 76–87. – DOI: 10.25513/1812-3988.2018.1.76-87.
10. 5 Trends Emerge in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2018. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-emerge-in-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies‑2018. Доступ 29.07.2019.
11. 5 Trends Appear on the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2019. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-appear-on-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies‑2019/. Доступ 14.10.2019.
12. Hartmann, B., King, W. P., Narayanan, S. Digital manufacturing: The revolution will be virtualized. McKinsey Quarterly, Aug. 2015. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/digital-manufacturing-therevolution-will-be-virtualized. Доступ 21.10.2019.
13. Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. 2016 Global Industry 4.0 Survey [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/industries‑4.0/landing-page/industry‑4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april‑2016.pdf. Доступ 14.10.2019.
14. Nyikes, Z., Tokody, D., Kovács, T. In situ testing of rail damages in accordance with Industry 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2018, Vol. 1045, Iss. 1, p. 012032. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1045/1/012032.
15. Гридин В. Н., Доенин В. В., Панищев В. С., Бысов И. Д. Нейронная сеть для прогнозирования нагрузок энергопотребления сортировочного узла // Мир транспорта. – 2019. – Т. 17. – № 3. – С. 6–15. – DOI: 10.30932/1992-3252-2019-17-3-6-15.
16. Розенберг Е. Н., Дзюба Ю. В., Батраев В. В. О направлениях развития цифровой железной дороги // Автоматика, связь, информатика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 9–13.
17. Розенберг Е. Н., Коровин А. С. Глобальные тренды развития интеллектуальных транспортных систем // Автоматика, связь, информатика. – 2018. – № 12. – С. 14–19.
18. Wang, Y., De Schutter, B., Boom van den, T., Ning, B. Optimal trajectory planning for trains under a moving block signaling system. Proceedings of the 2013 European Control Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 2013, рp. 4556–4561.
19. Розенберг Е. Н., Батраев В. В. Инновационное развитие систем интервального регулирования // Автоматика, связь, информатика. – 2018. – № 7. – С. 5–9.
20. Розенберг Е. Н., Коровин А. С. Управление функциональной безопасностью железнодорожного транспорта // Бюллетень Объединённого учёного совета ОАО РЖД. – 2018. – Т. 3. – С. 23–35.
21. Asaul, A., Malygin, I., Komashinskiy, V. The project of intellectual multimodal transport system. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 20, 2017, pp. 25–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.01.006.
22. Consortium for ITS Training and Education (CITE). [Электронный ресурс]: http://www.citeconsortium.org/partners/resources/. Доступ 21.10.2019.
23. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Professional Capacity Building (PCB) Strategic Plan, 2017–2021. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www.pcb.its.dot.gov/strategic_plan/toc.aspx. Доступ 21.10.2019.
Review
For citations:
Zheleznov M.M., Karasеv O.I., Trostyansky S.S., Shitov E.A. CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PRIORITIES OF THE RAILWAY INDUSTRY: GLOBAL EXPERIENCES. World of Transport and Transportation. 2019;17(5):16-37. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2019-17-5-16-37
Views:
448
Email this article 