Increasing the Capacity of a Locomotive Depot by Prioritising Organisational and Technical Measures

One of the key elements affecting the capacity of the technical station with locomotive turnover points and the entire segment of railway network is an insufficient technical equipment of locomotive maintenance points (LMP), which is a «threshold» that prevents the stability of loaded trains’ traffic.
To eliminate such threshold in a particular depot and the losses associated with unproductive downtime of transiting trains, as well as to increase the efficiency of LMP operation, it is necessary to provide for a series of organisational and technical measures. Such measures may be numerous and the task to determine their priority becomes rather difficult. This complexity is explained through different significance (impact on the process) and differentiated dimensions of the criteria necessary to make decision on correct prioritisation once those criteria are compared.
The article proposes to use a special method, tested on a wide variety of practical problems, which allows selecting the best solution from the options under consideration or determining their priority (usefulness) to increase the capacity of a locomotive depot without limiting the number of decision-making criteria when considering possible organisational and technical measures.
The work proposes most promising sequence of the organisational and technical measures to be considered to improve the efficiency of LMP using the method of expert assessments based on multi-criteria assessment, which involves the information necessary to solve the problem, converting it into a dimensionless form, which allows operating the corresponding initial data regardless of their size. The transformation of information is carried out according to a deterministic algorithm and does not depend on the person that makes computations, which indicates the objectivity of the obtained result of solving the problem.
The proposed method for selecting the best option from those considered, as well as for choosing the sequence of their implementation, can also be used to solve similar problems in the absence or insufficiency of statistical data without carrying out complex economic calculations.

1. Gogrichiani, G. V. Objective determination based on the results of comparisons (tests) of a promising object with an unlimited number of conflicting criteria under consideration [Obektivnoe opredelenie po rezultatam sravnenii (ispytanii) perspektivnogo obekta pri neogranichennom mnozhestve rassmatrivaemykh protivorechivykh kriteriev]. Vestnik VNIIZhT, 2006, Iss. 6, pp. 14–15. EDN: HYOKXV.

2. Gogrichiani, G. V., Lyashenko, A. N. Regular method for solving problems of finding the best option from those considered in relation to the transport complex [Regulyarniy metod resheniya zadach po nakhozhdeniyu luchshego varianta iz rassmatrivaemykh primenitelno k transportnomu kompleksu]. Proceedings of I International Scientific and Practical Conference «Science 1520 VNIIZhT: Look beyond the horizon». Moscow, JSC VNIIZhT, 2021, pp. 83–86. EDN: YFFVLU.

3. Gogrichiani, G. V., Kazarinova, D. A. Selection of a promising anti-skid device from a considered set based on contradictory criteria [Vybor perspektivnogo protivoyuznogo ustroistva iz rassmatrivaemykh po sovokupnosti protivorechivykh kriteriev]. Vestnik VNIIZhT, 2014, Iss. 6, pp. 26–32. EDN: TOLHNF.

4. Macheret, D. A., Gogrichiani, G. V., Syrodoeva, T. I. Economic and mathematical approach to issues of movement of personnel in railway transport organisations [Ekonomikomatematicheskiy podkhod k voprosam kadrovykh peremeshchenii v organizatsiyakh zheleznodorozhnogo transporta]. Ekonomika zheleznykh dorog, 2015, Iss.37, pp. 68–76. EDN: UAECKN.

5. Mekhedov, M. I., Kornienko, N. V.The influence of technical and technological equipment of a locomotive maintenance point on the capacity of a railway line [Vliyanie tekhnicheskogo i tekhnologicheskogo osnashcheniya punkta tekhnicheskogo obsluzhivaniya lokomotivov na propusknuyu sposobnost zheleznodorozhnoi linii]. Vestnik VNIIZhT, 2021, Vol. 80, Iss.4, pp. 225–232. EDN: DDAGDB.

6. Kini, R. L., Raifa, H. Decision-Making under Various Criteria: Preferences and Substitutions. [Russian edition] Ed. by I. F. Shakhnov; transl. from English by V. V. Podinovsky et al. Moscow, Radio i svyaz publ., 1981, 560 p.

7. Kotenko, A. G. Methodology for risk-based planning of quality indicators of railway operational performance. D.Sc. (Eng) thesis [Metodologiya riskorientirovannogo planirovaniya kachesvennykh pokazatelei ekspluatatsionnoi rabotoi zheleznykh dorog. Diss…dokt.tekh.nauk]. St.Petersburg, PGUPS publ., 2014, 330 p. EDN: ZPKMED.

8. Kotenko, A. G. On approaches to reducing the computational complexity of logical problems of risk analysis [O podkhodakh k snizheniyu vychislitelnoi slozhnosti logicheskikh zadach analiza riska]. News of St. Petersburg State Transport University, 2011, Iss. 1 (26), pp. 180–188. EDN: NTZCGJ.

9. Danelyan, T.Ya. Formal methods of expert assessments [Formalnie metody ekspertnykh otsenok]. Economics, statistics and computer science, 2015, Iss. 1, pp. 183–187. EDN: TQJPJL.

10. Orlov, A. I. Expert assessments [Ekspertnie otsenki]. Zavodskaya laboratoriya, 1996, Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 54–60. [Electronic resource]: http://orlovs.pp.ru/stat/s3p8exp.zip. Last accessed 25.04.2023.

11. Emelyanov, S. V., Larionov, O. I. Multicriteria methods of decision making [Mnogokriterialnie metody prinyatiya reshenii]. Moscow, Znanie publ., 1985, 32 p.

12. Larichev, O. I. Decision making as a scientific area: methodological problems. Systems research. Methodological problems. Yearbook [Prinyatie reshenii kak nauchnoe napravlenie: metodologicheskie problemy. Sistemnie issledovaniya. Metodologicheskie problemy. Ezhegodnik]. Ed. by D. M. Gvishiani, V. N. Sadovsky. Moscow, Nauka publ., Iss. 14, 1982, pp. 227–243. [Electronic resource]: https://raai.robofob.ru/about/persons/laritchev/papers/text/Larichev_1982.pdf. Last accessed 25.04.2023.

13. Aven, T. Misconceptions of Risk. John Wiley and sons Inc., 2010, 264 p. ISBN 978-0-470-68388-0.

14. Aven, T. Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2008, 208 p. ISBN 978-0-470-69443-5.

15. Aven, T., Vinnem, J. E. Risk Management: With Application from the Offshore Petroleum Industry. Springer, 2007, 211 p. ISBN 978-1-84628-652-0.