Alternativeness in the Architectural Design of Bridges and Overpasses
https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-2-9
Abstract
Modern extensive foreign and domestic experience in design and construction of multifunctional overpasses and bridges indicates that they have become an integral part of urbanised systems. They are endowed with the functions of important urban objects, and with their appearance they have won the right to be considered iconic structures. The subject of the article refers to architectural design of bridges and overpasses. The authors set themselves the task of considering the aspects of combining the main functional characteristics with the aesthetic properties of the object, designating visual components of the project and the specifics of alternativeness of design.
The objective of the work is to consider alternativeness in architectural design of bridges and overpasses. A complex method, combining an analysis of the historical and modern experience of architectural theory and design practices, was based on technical literary materials. The study resulted in formulating indicators and leading principles of alternative design.
The use of alternatives in the process of designing urban bridges and overpasses allows not only to consider functionality and economic feasibility of a particular project and construction of an object, but also its architectural and artistic orientation, aesthetic component, as well as the designer’s worldview and current trends in architecture. In the process of alternative design of bridges and overpasses, it is required to reproduce the overall complete image of the future structure, consider all kinds of details in structures and shape, and various criteria for layout and location in the environment.
About the Authors
I. A. Odenbakh
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Odenbakh, Irina A., Ph.D. (Pedagogics), Associate Professor at the Department of Roads and Building Materials
Orenburg
S. A. Orekhov
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Orekhov, Sergey A., Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor at the Department of Roads and Building Materials
Orenburg
E. B. Taurit
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Taurit, Elena B., Senior Lecturer at the Department of Roads and Building Materials
Orenburg
References
1. Vasiliev, D.A. Eco-sustainable architecture in modern Russia [Ekoustoichivaya arkhitektura v sovremennoi Rossii]. Colloquium-journal, 2020, Iss. 15 (67), pp. 5–7. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43065355. Last accessed 08.06.2022. DOI: 10.24411/2520-6990-2020-11925.
2. Dzhankulaev, A. A. Ecological architecture in modern construction [Ekologicheskaya arkhitektura v sovremennom stroitelstve]. Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2021, Iss. 7 (132), pp. 50–52. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45747287. Last accessed 08.06.2022.
3. Kuznetsova, A. A., Zhdanova, I. V., Voronina, I. I. Architecture of XX century as a builder of society [Arkhitektura XX veka kak stroitel obshchestva]. Proceedings of Samara Scientific Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, humanitarian, medical and biological sciences, 2020, Vol. 22, Iss. 72, pp. 72–77. DOI: 10.37313/2413-9645-2020-22-72-71-75.
4. Mikheev, G. V., Kapoguzova, E. Ya., Vadimovich, Yu. A., Khaliullin, T. D., Khalili, F. Engineering and architectural technologies for designing buildings taking into account the climatic features of the territory [Inzhenernie i arkhitekturnie tekhnologii proektirovaniya zdanii s uchetom klimaticheskikh osobennostei territorii]. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki, 2021, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, p. 9. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45797792. Last accessed 08.06.2022.
5. Mosyakin, D. S., Kritsky, I. V. Pros and cons of XX century construction [Plyusy i minusy stroitelstva XX veka]. Stroitelnaya i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost, 2021, Iss. 22 (74), pp. 43–47. [Electronic resource]: https://stroyjurnal-asa.ru/index.php/asa/issue/view/70. Last accessed 08.06.2022.
6. Nizamova, A. Integration of modern technologies in construction [Integratsiya sovremennykh tekhnologii v stroitelstvo]. Colloquium-journal, 2021, Iss. 16–1 (103), pp. 4–6. DOI: 10.24412/2520-6990-2021-16103-4-6.
7. Striban, A. I., Mosyakin, D. S. Organic architecture and classification of its directions [Organicheskaya arkhitektura i klassifikatsiya ee napravlenii]. Stroitelstvo i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost, 2021, Iss. 21 (73), pp. 37–42. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46353571. Last accessed 08.06.2022.
8. Turkina, E. A. Potential of modular shaping of architecture in modern conditions of development [Potentsial modulnogo formoobrazovaniya arkhitektury v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2020, Iss. 12, pp. 191–193. [Electronic resource]: http://innovazia.ru/upload/iblock/b11/%E2 %84 %9612 %202020.pdf. Last accessed 08.06.2022.
9. Avali Ali; Ahmed Hamza Ahmed Hussein; Mugham Taher Adel Taher; Abdulvahid Balig Mohammed Hazaa; Al-Buriahi Ammar Sultan Abdulghaffar; Mohammed Mohammed Ahmed Saleh. Benefits and challenges encountered in utilization building information modelling in construction projects. International journal of humanities and natural sciences, 2021, Iss. 11–3 (62), pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-11-3-26-30.
10. Iliev, Ben-Zion. Modern Trends in Innovative Construction Projects. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 2019, Iss.7, Iss. 2, pp. 53–56. DOI: 10.26794/2308-944X2019-7-2-53-56.
11. Iliev, Ben-Zion. World Construction Market. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 2019, Iss. 7 (2), pp. 32–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2019-7-2-32-36.
12. Montgomery, C. Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design [Edition in Russian]. Sc. ed. L. Gordon; Trans. from English by Yu. Konstantinova. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2019, 368 p. ISBN 978-5-00117-687-9.
13. Toan Nguyen Quoc; Tam Nguyen Van; Diep Tran Ngoc; Anh Pham Xuan. Adoption of building information modeling in the construction project life cycle: benefits for stakeholders. Architecture and Engineering, 2022, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 56–71. DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2022-7-1-56-71.
14. Vitruvius. Ten books about architecture [Desyat’ knig ob arkhitekture]. Transl. from lat. By F. A. Petrovsky. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2003, 328 p.
15. Kartopoltsev, V. M., Kukharenko, S. A., Kiseleva, K. V. Towards alternativeness in bridge architecture [K voprosu ob alternativnosti v arkhitekturnom proektirovanii mostov]. Vestnik TGASU, 2017, Iss. 2 (61), pp. 192–203. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28983873. Last accessed 23.04.2022.
16. Gorbacheva, I. A., Ovchinnikov, I. I., Ovchinnikov, I. G. Study of the applicability of bridge aesthetics postulates to the problem of designing bridges [Issledovanie primenimosti postulatov mostovoi stetiki k zadache proektirovaniya mostov]. Transportnie sooruzheniya, 2017, Vol. 4, Iss.4, p. 10. DOI: 10.15862/12TS417.
Review
For citations:
Odenbakh I.A., Orekhov S.A., Taurit E.B. Alternativeness in the Architectural Design of Bridges and Overpasses. World of Transport and Transportation. 2023;21(2):76–82. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-2-9
Views:
195
Email this article 