Preview

World of Transport and Transportation

Advanced search

The Influence of the Socionic Characteristics of a Pilot on the Features of Perception and Interpretation of Displayed Flight Instrument Information

https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2022-20-5-11

Abstract

The article continues a series of papers by the authors of the results of the study on perception and interpretation by a pilot of visual information provided by flight instruments. The data presented refer to experiments conducted in 2021–2022 with a sample of 50 cadet pilots. According to V. A. Sychev, the wellknown aviation professor, in the piloting technique, perceptual errors are most common. Among many flight instruments important for piloting an aircraft, there is one whose influence on the «Loss of control in-flight» (LOC–I) problem is the greatest – this is the attitude indicator. Several catastrophes are associated with perceptual errors of the readings of attitude indicators. One of the most tragic accidents of this kind was the crash near Perm on September 14, 2008, of a Boeing‑737 aircraft.
The paper presents the results of a comparative study carried out to identify individual differences in perception and interpretation by tested cadet pilots of the roll indications on the attitude indicator with the «inside-out» and «outside-in» display options. During task performance, the participants were presented with a sequential series of images in the form of slides with roll indications of the attitude indicator with different display options. The experiment was carried out using a stationary Eye Tracker Tobii REX device. The analysis and processing of the data obtained was carried out using a special computer software developed by A. P. Plyasovskikh at the All-Russian scientific Research Institute of Radio Equipment. The participants to the experiment underwent also psychodiagnostics using Keirsey and MM‑1 socionic tests. Results were subject to mathematical processing with correlation analysis and G-sign test.
The arguments given by some authors in favour of the «outside-in» version of the indication were fully confirmed since the number of errors when determining the side of the roll on the «inside-out» display of the attitude indicator turned out to be seven times higher than on the «outside-in» display. The hypothesis that socionic characteristics are predictors of the pilot’s correct perception and interpretation of visual instrumental information has not been confirmed. It is possible that the absence of significant correlations was also influenced by the significant uniformity in the socionic characteristics of the surveyed persons.

About the Authors

O. A. Arinicheva
St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation

Arinicheva, Olga V., Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor at the Department of Civil Aviation Flight Operation and Flight Safety

St. Petersburg



A. V. Malishevsky
St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation

Malishevsky, Aleksey V., Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor at the Department of Civil Aviation Flight Operation and Flight Safety

St. Petersburg



References

1. Vojtik, A. D. Different types of roll indication and their perception by the pilot. Problemy letnoi ekspluatatsii i bezopasnost poletov, 2021, Iss. 15, pp. 212–216. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48701658. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

2. Arinicheva, O. V., Lebedeva, N. A., Malishevsky, A. V., Arefiev, R. O. Investigation of errors in determining the roll using attitude indicators with various types of indication [Issledovanie oshibok opredeleniya krena s pomoshchyu aviagorizontov s razlichnymi vidami indikatsii]. Actual problems and prospects for development of civil aviation: Proceedings of 10th International scientific-practical conference (Irkutsk, October 14–15, 2021). Irkutsk branch of Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation. Irkutsk, 2021, pp. 45–50. [Electronic resource]: http://if-mstuca.ru/konferentciia/images/Sborniki/Sbornik_X_NPK-2021_tom_2.pdf. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

3. Aircraft accident report. China Airlines Boeing 747-SP. N4522V 300 nautical miles northwest of San Francisco, California February 19, 1985. National Transportation Safety Board. PB86–910403. NTSB/AAR-86/03. USA, Washington, D.C., 1986, 46 p. [Electronic resource]: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR8603.pdf. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

4. Alyakrinsky, B. S. Fundamentals of aviation psychology [Osnovy aviatsionnoi psikhologii]. Moscow, Vozdushniy transport publ., 1985, 312 p. [Electronic resource]: https://rusist.info/book/5918799. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

5. Kozlov, V. V. To the pilot about the pilot from the psychophysiologist of flight work [Pilotu o pilote ot psikhofiziologa letnogo truda]. Moscow, Beliy veter publ., 2017, 256 p. [Electronic resource]: https://avam-avia.ru/novosti/o-chelovecheskom-faktore-dlya-pilotov/. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

6. Kovalenko, P. A. Additional psychological investigation of the impact of inside-out indication in attitude indicators on the crash of Boeing-737 aircraft on 14.09.08 near Perm [Psikhologicheskoe «dorassledovanie vliyaniya «pryamoi» indikatsii v aviagorizontakh na katastrofu samoleta Boeing-737 14.09.08 pod Permyu]. Problemy bezopasnosti polyotov [Flight Safety Problems], 2011, Iss. 2, pp. 9–28, Iss. 3, pp. 10–28, Iss. 4, pp. 11–28, Iss. 5, pp. 9–18. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15595840. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

7. Kovalenko, P. A. The detrimental effect of «direct» indication in artificial horizons on the crash of Boeing-737 aircraft on 14.09.08 near Perm and other accidents. Additional psychological «investigation» [Pagubnoe vliyanie «pryamoi» indikatsii v aviagorizontakh na katastrofu samoleta Boeing-737 14.09.08 pod Permyu i drugie aviaproisshestviya. Psikhologicheskoe «dorassledovanie»]. Moscow, MGOU publ., 2011, 107 p. [Electronic resource]: http://www.usability.ru/sources/Kovalenko-Aiagorizont-2011. pdf. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

8. Gerasimenkova, A. E., Girenko, I. Yu., Dibrova, A. A. [et al]. Possible ways to improve the professional psychological selection of air traffic controllers [Vozmozhnie puti sovershenstvovaniya professionalnogo psikhologicheskogo otbora dispetcherov organizatsii vozdushnogo dvizheniya]. Problemy letnoi ekspluatatsii i bezopasnost poletov, 2018, Vol. 12, pp. 127–145. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36333041. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

9. Arinicheva O., Lebedeva N., Malishevskii A., Arefyev R. Attitude Indicators in Bank Angle Determination: A Study of Errors. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Recent Advances in Civil Aviation. Eds.: O. A. Gorbachev, X. Gao, B. Li. Singapore, Springer, 2022, pp. 281–289. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-3788-0_24.

10. CRM in Russia: Training of a strong commander (5th edition). Psychodiagnostics [CRM Rossii: Trening silnogo komandira (pyataya redaktsiya). Psikhodiagnostika]. Comp. by A. V. Malishevsky, N. F. Mikhailik. 2nd ed., rev. and enl. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of the Academy of Civil Aviation, 2000, 40 p.

11. Keirsey, D. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Del Mar, CA, US: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, 1998, 350 p. [Electronic resource]: https://archive.org/details/pleaseunderstand00keir. [Access restricted for subscribers].

12. Leichenko, S. D., Malishevsky, A. V., Mikhailik, N. F. Human factor in aviation: Monograph in 2 volumes. Vol. 2 [Chelovecheskiy factor v aviatsii: Monografiya v 2 t. T.2]. St. Petersburg, GU GA; Kirovograd, GLAU, 2006, 512 p. [Electronic resource]: https://rusist.info/book/836911. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

13. Bukalov, A. V. On the difference between socionics and Myers-Briggs typology. Sotsionika, mentologiya i psikhologiya lichnosti, 2003, Iss. 6 (51), pp. 62–64. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28359782. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

14. Ventzel, E. S. Probability Theory: Textbook [Teoriya veroyatnostei: Uchebnik]. 11th ed., stereotype. Moscow, KnoRus publ., 2010, 664 p. ISBN 978-5-406-00476-0.

15. Sidorenko, E. V. Methods of mathematical processing in psychology [Metody matematicheskoi obrabotki v psikhologii]. St. Petersburg, Social-psychological canter, 1996, 349 p. ISBN 5-9268-0010-2.

16. Grigoriev, I. I. Russia has lost orientation in types of indication by attitude indicators [Rossiya poteryala orientirovku v vydakh indikatsii na aviagorizontakh]. Problemy bezopasnosti polyotov [Flight Safety Problems], 2011, Iss 2, pp. 28–46. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=15595841. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

17. Chuntul, A. V. Which attitude indicators are safer for the flight? [S kakimi aviagorizontami letat’ bezopasnee?]. Problemy bezopasnosti polyotov [Flight Safety Problems], 2011, Iss. 4, pp. 29–40. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16326288. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

18. Zemlyanoy, A. F. Considering inside-out and outside-in indication of spatial position of the aircraft [Rassmotrenie voprosa priamoy i obratnoy indikatsii prostranstvennogo polozheniya VS]. Problemy bezopasnosti polyotov [Flight Safety Problems], 2013, Iss. 4, pp. 16–38. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19119487. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

19. Kopysov, V. Kh. Indication on attitude indicators [Indikatsiya na aviagorizontakh]. Nauchnyi vestnik UI GA, 2016, Iss. 8, pp. 19–24. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26727532. Last accessed 29.09.2022.

20. Arinicheva, O. V., Lebedeva, N. A., Malishevskii, A. V. Application of eye-tracking technology as a diagnostic tool for assessing flight operators. Part 1: Analise of flight operators’ attention distribution and switching using eyetracking. Transport Problems, 2020, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp. 167–179. DOI: 10.21307/tp-2020-042.

21. Arinicheva, O. V., Malishevskiy, A. V. Shortcomings of the existing professional selection of pilots and the challenge of its improvement. Transport: nauka, tekhnika, upravlenie, 2016, Iss. 6, pp. 41–51. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26254884. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

22. Arinicheva, O. V., Malishevsky, A. V. Professional selection of personnel: is the «Guideline» of 2001 out of date [Professionalniy otbor personala: ne ustarelo li «Rukovodstvo» 2001 goda]. Airport Partner, 2017, Iss. 5 (119), pp. 24–27.

23. Arinicheva, O. V., Malishevskii, A. V. Back to Jung: are the authors of this article socionics? Sotsionika, mentologiya i psikhologiya lichnosti, 2017, Iss. 2, pp. 42–51. [Electronic resource]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29827179. Last accessed 07.08.2022.

24. Rumshisky, L. Z. Mathematical processing of experimental results [Matematicheskaya obrabotka rezultatov eksperimenta]. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1971, 192 p. [Electronic resource]: https://lib-bkm.ru/10016. Last accessed 07.08.2022. 23. Augustinavičiūtė, A. Socionics [Sotsionika]. Moscow, Chernaya belka publ., 2016, 464 p. ISBN 978-5-91827-023-3.


Review

For citations:


Arinicheva O.A., Malishevsky A.V. The Influence of the Socionic Characteristics of a Pilot on the Features of Perception and Interpretation of Displayed Flight Instrument Information. World of Transport and Transportation. 2022;20(5):94-102. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2022-20-5-11

Views: 271


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1992-3252 (Print)