A Formalised Approach to Optimal Adoption of a Complex of Technical Means
https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2021-19-3-5
Abstract
The research relates to the field of automation of technological preparation of production in transport equipment manufacturing sector and proposes the concept of choosing the optimal design model for a complex of technical means within a control system in automated production. The factors characterising the dynamics of the processes have been studied, and the corresponding mathematical models have been drawn up, considering the cost characteristics and the economic feasibility of adopting integrated
technical means.
The main objective of this work is to propose consideration of all parameters that have weight, including the dynamics of technical and economic processes. It is shown that cost characteristics are direct indicators of economic efficiency of the implemented complex of technical means.
Methodically, this work was carried out based on economic and mathematical analysis of adoption of a complex of technical means at a transport equipment manufacturing enterprise considering approaches previously suggested by researchers.
Thus, for the most accurate determination of the final cost of a certain product option, it is necessary to consider all factors of design decisions. Based on these data, a model of cost characteristics of products is built, analysing which it is possible to select the optimal product design, optimal assemblies and units with specific components and specific quality indicators. This allows obtaining the optimal technological version of the design solution during manufacturing.
A method of searching for an optimal production cycle when introducing an automated production system is proposed. It is proposed to consider the losses associated with temporary freezing of funds, including the need to perform a convolution of optimization criteria. To formalise the process of making optimal decisions, it is also proposed to harmonise the products and market needs.
Besides, the search methodology should include the search for an optimal group of employees responsible for implementation of specific and narrowly focused tasks, which makes it possible to improve the quality indicators of automated production with an adopted complex of technical means (CTM).
To minimise the time spent on entire commissioning of a product from the development stage to receipt of the finished product, it is required to speed up the development work. This can be done by increasing production capacity, as well as by reducing the time of partial cycles of the structure’s existence.
Even though the model is becoming excessively redundant, we suppose that introduction of additional elements is necessary to consider all the nuances that help choosing the best solution regarding optimisation issues, which will allow determining of the full economic efficiency of the complex.
About the Authors
T. A. PopovaRussian Federation
Lecturer
Moscow
A. P. Popov
Russian Federation
Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Makarenko, S. I. Technical and economic analysis of feasibility of introducing new technological solutions [Tekhniko-ekonomicheskiy analiz tselesoobraznosti vnedreniya novykh tekhnologicheskikh reshenii]. Sistemy upravleniya, svyazi i bezopasnosti, 2016, Iss. 1, pp. 278−287. [Electronic resource]: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehniko-ekonomicheskiy-analiz-tselesoobraznostivnedreniya-novyh-tehnologicheskih-resheniy/pdf. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
2. Sánchez, A., Lago, A., Ferràs, X., Ribera, J. Innovation Management Practices, Strategic Adaptation, and Business Results: Evidence from the Electronics Industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2011, Vol. 6, Iss. 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000200002.
3. Viharos, Zs. J., Monostori, L., Csongrádi, Z. An important aspect of a digital factory: Monitoring of complex production systems; WESIC 2003, 4th Workshop on European Scientific and Industrial Collaboration; Miskolc, Hungary, May 28−30, 2003, pp. 363−370. [Electronic resource]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250068677_an_important_aspect_of_a_digital_factory_monitoring_of_complex_production_systems. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
4. Popov, A. P. Increasing the efficiency of designing a control system for technological processes based on optimisation of a complex of technical means. Ph.D. (Eng) thesis [Povyshenie effektivnosti proektirovaniya sitemy upravleniya tekhnologicheskimi protsessami na osnove optimizatsii kompleksa tekhnicheskikh sredstv. Dis... kand. tekh. nauk]. MSTU Stankin, 2010, 165 p. [Electronic resource]: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_004600152/. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
5. Abdrashitov, R. T., Abramov, K. N. Improving the efficiency of automated systems for technological preparation of production [Povyshenie effektivnosti avtomatizirovannykh sistem tekhnologicheskoi podgotovki proizvodstva]. Vestnik OSU, 2000, Iss. 1 (4), pp. 65−70. [Electronic resource]: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/povyshenie-effektivnostiavtomatizirovannyh-sistem-tehnologicheskoy-podgotovkiproizvodstva/pdf/. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
6. Popov, A. P., Popova, T. A. Continuity in the Design of a Complex of Technical Means. World of Transport and Transportation, 2014, Vol. 12, Iss. 5, pp. 124−129. [Electronic resource]: https://mirtr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/149. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
7. Lee, R. Optimal estimates, determination of characteristics and control [Optimalnie otsenki, opredelenie kharakteristik i upravlenie]. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1966, 176 p.
8. Poezzhalova, S. N., Selivanov, S. G., Borodkina, O. A., Kuznetsova, K. S. Recurrent neural networks and methods of optimisation of design technological processes in ASTPP machine-building production [Rekurrentnie neironnie seti I metody optimizatsii proektnykh tekhnologicheskikh
9. protsessov v ASTPP mashinostroitelnogo proizvodstva]. Vestnik USATU, 2011, Vol. 15, Iss. 5 (45), pp. 36−46. [Electronic resource]: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rekurrentnye-neyronnye-seti-i-metody-optimizatsiiproektnyh-tehnologicheskih-protsessov-v-astppmashinostroitelnogo-proizvodstva/pdf. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
10. Bradley, D. A. Mechatronics − Electronics in Products and Processes. Chapman & Hall, 1993, 376 p.
11. Shalaev, I. A., Kharitonova, A. A. Indicators for assessing the effectiveness of financing innovative projects [Pokazateli otsenki effektivnosti finansirovaniya innovatsionnykh proektov]. Vector of Economics, 2017, Iss. 11 (17), pp. 41−49. [Electronic resource]: http://www.vectoreconomy.ru/images/publications/2017/11/innovationmanagement/Shalaev_Kharitonova.pdf. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
12. Goransky, G. K., Bendereva, E. I. Technological design in integrated automated systems for production preparation [Tekhnologicheskoe proektirovanie v kompleksnykh avtomatizirovannykh sistemakh podgotovki proizvodstva], 1981, 456 p.
13. Kapustin, N. M., Pavlov, V. V. [et al]. Dialogue design of technological processes [Dialogovoe proektirovanie tekhnologicheskikh protsessov]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie publ., 1981, 287 p.
14. Mitrofanov, S. P. Scientific organisation of serial production [Nauchnaya organizatsiya seriinogo proizvodstva]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie publ., 1970, 212 p.
15. Svirsky, D. N., Klimentiev, A. L. Automation of technological decision making in compact production of machine-building products [Avtomatizatsiya prinyatiya tekhnologicheskikh reshenii v kompaktnom proizvodstve mashinostroitelnoi produktsii]. Bulletin of Polotsk State University. Series B, 2010, Iss. 2, pp. 54−62. [Electronic resource]: https://elib.psu.by/bitstream/123456789/1765/1/Svirskij_2010-2-p54.pdf. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
16. Copeland, T., Koller, T., Murrin, J. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Values of Companies. Journal of Mathematical Finance, August 18, 2014, Vol. 4, Iss. 4. [Electronic resource]: https://www.pdfdrive.com/valuationmeasuring-and-managing-the-value-of-companies-3rdedition-e158622059.html. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
17. Jayani, Rajapathirana R. P.; Yan, Hui. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, April 2018, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 44−55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002.
18. Shalaev, I. A., Mishunina, I. S., Pokoptseva, S. A. Modern analysis and methods of assessing financial risks [Sovremenniy analiz i metody otsnki finansovykh riskov]. Ekonomika i sotsium, 2016, Iss. 12-2 (31), pp. 1677−1683. [Electronic resourceс]: https://readera.org/sovremennyjanaliz-i-metody-ocenki-finansovyh-riskov-140117481. Last accessed 17.08.2020.
19. Kondratiev, A. I. Improving preparation of production of machine parts based on the use of formal estimates of similarity of design solutions [Sovershenstvovanie podgotovki proizvodstva detalei mashin na osnove primeneniya formalnykh otsenok podobiya proektnykh reshenii]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 2016, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 36−43.
20. Glichev, A. V. Economic efficiency of technical systems [Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost tekhnicheskikh sistem]. Moscow, Ekonomika publ., 1971, 270 p.
Review
For citations:
Popova T.A., Popov A.P. A Formalised Approach to Optimal Adoption of a Complex of Technical Means. World of Transport and Transportation. 2021;19(3):45-52. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2021-19-3-5