Maintenance of Low-Intensity Railways in Modern Conditions
https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2020-18-190-200
Abstract
The article is devoted to clarification of the structure of maintenance of low-intensity railways by optimising infrastructure maintenance operational personnel using the example of Mikunsky infrastructure section of the Northern Infrastructure Directorate of Russian Railways. As an example of the distance for operation of infrastructure, the article considers Berlin section of infrastructure of German railways. The task of organising the activities of the infrastructure linear enterprise of the track complex, including track section workers (PC), signalling, centralisation and blocking (SCB) maintenance section personnel working within enlarged teams and emergency repairs teams equipped with service trains and KamAZ vehicles, is considered. For the analysis of information uncertainty, an information model is proposed, for which the risk is considered in the form of determining losses. At the stage of preliminary calculations, a change in the number of maintenance personnel will make it possible to obtain a reduction in operating costs.
About the Authors
N. I. Kovalenko
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D.Sc. (Eng), Professor,
Moscow
N. A. Kovalenko
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor,
Moscow
References
1. Yushkov, M. E. Organization of the use of the infrastructure of low-activity railway lines on the basis of an integral assessment of their activities. Ph.D. (Eng) thesis [Organizatsiya ispolzovaniya infrastruktury malodeyatelnykh zheleznodorozhnykh linii na osnove integralnoi otsenki ikh deyatelnosti. Dis… kand. tekh. nauk]. Yekaterinburg, URGUPS, 2014, 163 p. [Electronic resource]: https://www.usurt.ru/download-document/2500. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
2. Chudzikiewicz, A. Simulation evaluation of the costs of adapting the low density traffic line to practical exploitation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, Vol. 20, pp. 244–250. [Electronic resource]: https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/523800.pdf. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
3. Kirilenko, O. N. Economic efficiency of methods of operation of low-activity lines [Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost metodov ekspluatatsii malodeyatelnykh linii]. Ekonomika zheleznykh dorog, 2014, Iss. 8, pp. 79–85. [Electronic resource]: https://er.nau.edu.ua/bitstream/NAU/16945/1/Статья_Кириленко_Россия.doc. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
4. Glushchenko, V. A. Complex brigades in lowactivity areas [South Ural railway] [Kompleksnie brigady na malodeyatelnykh uchastkakh [Uzhno-Uralskoi dorogi]]. Put’ i putevoe khozyaistvo, 2010, Iss. 1, pp. 24–25. [Electronic resource]: http://scbist.com/xx1/12276-zhurnal-put-i-p-h-kompleksnye-brigady-namalodeyatelnyh-uchastkah-print.html. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
5. Vakulenko, S. P., Kolin, A. V., Evreenova, N. Yu. Low-Density Lines: State and Optimization Options. World of Transport and Transportation, 2017, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp. 174–180.
6. Zamyshlyaev, A. M., Akopyan, A., Mikhalkin, I. K., Gapanovitch, V., Shubinsky, I. B. «Urran» – entwicklung von rams bei den russischen eisenbahnen. Der Eisenbahningenieur: Fachzeitschrift fuer Eisenbahntechnik, 2014, Vol. 65, Iss. 1, pp. 50–53. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31605272. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
7. Le revival du GPEC, outil de prévision. Libération. [Electronic resource]: https://www.liberation.fr/futurs/2007/05/10/le-revival-du-gpec-outil-deprevision_92732. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
8. Scheier, B., Bussmann, A., Brinkmann, F., Wendland, U. Cost efficiency analysisof the satellite based train control system Sat in Germany. Signal + Draht, 2015, No. 11, pp. 36–40. [Electronic resource]: https://elib.dlr.de/95568/1/DLR_DB_Signal%2BDraht_11_2015_3InSat.pdf. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
9. Barbu, G., Hanis, G., Kaiser, F., Standlmann, B. SATLOC–CNSS based train protection for low traffic lines. Signal + Draht, 2014, No. 4, pp. 49–53. [Electronic resource]: https://www.k-report.net/discus/archiv2014/28/SATLOC-256660.pdf. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
10. EMISS. State statistics. Official statistics [EMISS. Gosudarstvennaya statistika. Offitsialnie statisticheskie pokazateli]. [Electronic resource]: http://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/data.do. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
11. Kovalenko, N. I., Kovalenko, A. N. Proposals for maintenance of low-intensity railways in modern conditions [Predlozheniya tekhnicheskogo obsluzhivaniya malointensivnykh zheleznykh dorog v sovremennykh usloviyakh]. In: Modern problems of design, construction and operation of the roadbed of railways. Section 2. Railway track for heavy traffic. Moscow, MIIT publ., 2017. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35052400. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
12. Odolinski, K., Boysen, H. E. Railway line capacity utilisation and its impact on maintenance costs. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, May 2019, Vol. 9, pp. 22–33. [Electronic resource]: https://www.cts.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.824862.1600688725!/CTS2018–10.pdf. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
13. Banar, M., Özdemir, A. An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, December 2015, Vol. 41, pp.88–105.[Electronic resource]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1361920915001418?via%3Dihub. Last accessed 19.04.2020. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.017.
14. Kovalenko, N. I., Lysenko, N. N., Aimaletdinov, Kh. R. To the question of clarifying the norms of frequency of capital repairs to improve safety of high-speed traffic [K voprosu utochneniya norm periodichnosti kapitalnykh remontnykh rabot dlya povysheniya bezopasnosti skorostnogo dvizheniya]. Safety of train traffic: Proceedings of VI scientific and practical conference: in 2 volumes; Vol. 1: JSC Russian Railways. VNIIZhT. VNIIAS. MIIT. Moscow, MIIT publ., 2005, pp. V-10–11.
15. Romanov, I. A. Principles of assessing the effectiveness of innovative projects in the field of transport [Printsipy otsenki effektivnosti innovatsionnykh proektov v sfere transporta]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya, 2013, Iss. 5, pp. 135–136. [Electronic resource]: https://natural-sciences.ru/pdf/2013/5/76.pdf. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
16. Methodical recommendations for assessment of investment projects in railway transport [Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke investitsionnykh proektov na zheleznodorozhnom transporte]. Moscow, 1998, 123 p.
17. Fraszczyk, A., Lamb, T., Marinov, M. Are railways really that bad? An evaluation of rail systems performance in Europe with a focus on passenger rail. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, Vol. 94, pp. 573–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.018.
18. Tsvetkov, V. Ya. Conceptual Model of the Innovative Projects Efficiency Estimation // European Journal of Economic Studies, 2012, Vol. 1, pp. 45–50. [Electronic resource]: https://docplayer.ru/72314679-European-journal-of-economic-studies-2012- vol-1-1-conceptual-model-of-the-innovative-projectsefficiency-estimation-victor-ya.html. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
19. Markelov, V. M., Romanov, I. A. Innovatics and geoinformatics [Innovatika i geoinformatika].Distantsionnoe i virtualnoe obuchenie, 2012, Iss. 12, pp. 53–57. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18193030. Last accessed 19.04.2020.
Review
For citations:
Kovalenko N.I., Kovalenko N.A. Maintenance of Low-Intensity Railways in Modern Conditions. World of Transport and Transportation. 2020;18(5):190-200. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2020-18-190-200
Views:
368
Email this article 