Freight Electric Multiple-Unit Trains as an Alternative to Locomotive Traction. Comparison and Analysis
https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2019-17-3-72-81
Abstract
The advantages of introduction of modular freight electric trains in comparison with freight trains using locomotive traction are described, the main prerequisites for introduction of a distributed multiple-unit freight traction are indicated. The results of comparison of the technology of transportation with traction by locomotive situated at the head of the train and by the train with self-propelled coaches, as well as the analysis of traction calculations of two types of trains are suggested. The international experience of developing freight trains with distributed traction is described.
The main directions of implementation of the concept of accelerating freight transportation on the territory of the Russian Federation are noted. It is concluded that in modern conditions, when speed becomes an economic category, it is necessary to create rolling stock of a new generation (wheel and magnetic suspension), and introduction of freight trains with distributed traction becomes extremely relevant.
About the Authors
A. A. ZaytsevRussian Federation
D.Sc. (Economics), head of the scientific and educational center for innovative development of passenger railway transportation
St. Petersburg
P. S. Troitskiy
Russian Federation
Ph.D. student of the department of electric traction
St. Petersburg
References
1. Svintsov, E. S., Bushuev, N. S., Nemchenko, T. M., Romanov, A. V. Traction calculations in design of railways. Study guide [Tyagovie raschety pri proektirovanii zheleznykh dorog. Uchebnoe posobie]. St. Petersburg, PGUPS publ., 2004, 62 p.
2. Alexandrov, I. K. Modular Train: Energy Saving. World of Transport and Transportation, Vol. 11, 2013, Iss. 5, pp. 28–37.
3. Kurbasov, A. S. Heavy traffic of freight trains on the Russian railways: pro and contra [Tyazhelovesnoe dvizhenie gruzovykh poezdov na rossiiskikh zheleznykh dorogakh: za i protiv]. Nauka i transport, 2012, Iss. 3, pp. 22–29.
4. Svintsov, E. S., Bushuev, N. S., Nemchenko, T. M., Romanov, A. V. Traction calculations in design of railways. Study guide [Tyagovie raschety pri proektirovanii zheleznykh dorog. Uchebnoe posobie]. St. Petersburg, PGUPS publ., 2004, 62 p.
5. Larsson-Kråik, Per-Olof. Rail Maintenance Strategies Bases on Grinding, Wear and Lubrication – Swedish Ore Line (Malmbanan). Proc. 8th IHHA Conf. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005, pp. 17–28.
6. Kurbasov, A. S. Heavy traffic of freight trains on the Russian railways: pro and contra [Tyazhelovesnoe dvizhenie gruzovykh poezdov na rossiiskikh zheleznykh dorogakh: za i protiv]. Nauka i transport, 2012, Iss. 3, pp. 22–29.
7. Muginstein, L. A. Calculation of longitudinal dynamic forces in freight trains with distributed traction [Raschet prodolno-dinamicheskikh sil v gruzovykh poezdakh s raspredelennoi tyagoi]. Zheleznodorozhny transport, 2009, Iss. 2, pp. 12–19.
8. Larsson-Kråik, Per-Olof. Rail Maintenance Strategies Bases on Grinding, Wear and Lubrication – Swedish Ore Line (Malmbanan). Proc. 8th IHHA Conf. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005, pp. 17–28.
9. Sotnikov, E. A., Shapkin, I. N. Operational work on the railways of the world (conclusion) [Ekspluatatsionnaya rabota na zheleznykh dorogakh mira (okonchanie)]. Zheleznodorozhny transport, 2009, Iss. 2, pp. 70–72.
10. Muginstein, L. A. Calculation of longitudinal dynamic forces in freight trains with distributed traction [Raschet prodolno-dinamicheskikh sil v gruzovykh poezdakh s raspredelennoi tyagoi]. Zheleznodorozhny transport, 2009, Iss. 2, pp. 12–19.
11. Batisse, F. Multiple-unit trains – an alternative to locomotive traction [Motorvagonnie poezda – alternativa lokomotivnoi tyage]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2002, Iss. 1, pp. 32–35.
12. Sotnikov, E. A., Shapkin, I. N. Operational work on the railways of the world (conclusion) [Ekspluatatsionnaya rabota na zheleznykh dorogakh mira (okonchanie)]. Zheleznodorozhny transport, 2009, Iss. 2, pp. 70–72.
13. Distributed traction in freight trains. Editorial Review. [Obzor redaktsii. Raspredelennaya tyaga v gruzovykh poezdakh]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2001, Iss. 5, pp. 39–42.
14. Batisse, F. Multiple-unit trains – an alternative to locomotive traction [Motorvagonnie poezda – alternativa lokomotivnoi tyage]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2002, Iss. 1, pp. 32–35.
15. Vogel, H. Questions of increasing mass and length of trains [Voprosy uvechileniya massy i dliny poezdov]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2000, Iss. 9, pp. 31–35.
16. Distributed traction in freight trains. Editorial Review. [Obzor redaktsii. Raspredelennaya tyaga v gruzovykh poezdakh]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2001, Iss. 5, pp. 39–42.
17. Meulen, Dave van der. Railway globalization and heavy haul. Proceedings of the International Heavy Haul Association Specialist Technical Session, Kiruna, Sweden: International Heavy Haul Association, pp. 329–338.
18. Vogel, H. Questions of increasing mass and length of trains [Voprosy uvechileniya massy i dliny poezdov]. Zheleznie dorogi mira, 2000, Iss. 9, pp. 31–35.
19. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 07.05.2018 No. 204 «On national goals and strategic objectives of development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024» [Ukaz Presidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 07.05.2018 No. 204 «O natsionalnykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period 2024 goda»].
20. Meulen, Dave van der. Railway globalization and heavy haul. Proceedings of the International Heavy Haul Association Specialist Technical Session, Kiruna, Sweden: International Heavy Haul Association, pp. 329–338.
21. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 07.05.2018 No. 204 «On national goals and strategic objectives of development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024» [Ukaz Presidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 07.05.2018 No. 204 «O natsionalnykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period 2024 goda»].
Review
For citations:
Zaytsev A.A., Troitskiy P.S. Freight Electric Multiple-Unit Trains as an Alternative to Locomotive Traction. Comparison and Analysis. World of Transport and Transportation. 2019;17(3):72-81. https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2019-17-3-72-81