References

mirtr

Мир транспорта

World of Transport and Transportation

1992-3252

Russian University of Transport (RUT)

10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-6-14

mirtr-2621

Research Article

УПРАВЛЕНИЕ И ЭКОНОМИКА

MANAGEMENT, CONTROL AND ECONOMICS

Мультикритериальное сравнение контрейлерных систем

Multicriteria Comparison of Piggyback Systems

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-6725

Осинцев

Н. А.

Osintsev

N. A.

Осинцев Никита Анатольевич – кандидат технических наук, доцент кафедры логистики и управления транспортными системами

Web of Science Researcher ID: K-6237-2013; Scopus Author ID: 56386223400; РИНЦ Author ID: 401461.

Магнитогорск

Osintsev, Nikita A., Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor at the Department of Logistics and Transport Systems Management

Web of Science Researcher ID: K-6237-2013; Scopus ID: 56386223400; Russian Science Citation Index Author ID: 401461.

Magnitogorsk

osintsev@magtu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8857-6287

Цыганов

А. В.

Tsyganov

A. V.

Цыганов Александр Владимирович – кандидат технических наук, доцент кафедры логистики и управления транспортными системами

Web of Science Researcher ID: AAH-9785-2019; Scopus Author ID: 57209470019; РИНЦ Author ID: 677084

Магнитогорск

Tsyganov, Alexander V., Ph.D. (Eng), Associate Professor at the Department of Logistics and Transport Systems Management

Web of Science Researcher ID: AAH-9785-2019; Scopus ID: 57209470019; Russian Science Citation Index Author ID: 677084.

Magnitogorsk

tsyganov.alek@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6419-2561

Рахмангулов

А. Н.

Rakhmangulov

A. N.

Рахмангулов Александр Нельевич – доктор технических наук, профессор кафедры логистики и управления транспортными системами

Scopus Author ID: 13805427400;РИНЦ Author ID: 101054.

Магнитогорск

Rakhmangulov, Alexander N., D.Sc. (Eng), Professor at the Department of Logistics and Transport Systems Management

Scopus Author ID: 13805427400; Russian Science Citation Index Author ID: 101054.

Magnitogorsk

ran@magtu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6289-1078

Багинова

В. В.

Baginova

V. V.

Багинова Вера Владимировна – доктор технических наук, заведующий кафедрой логистики и управления транспортными системами

РИНЦ Author ID: 266200.

Москва

Baginova, Vera V., D.Sc. (Eng), Head of the Department of Logistics and Transport Systems Management

Russian Science Citation Index Author ID: 266200.

Moscow

vvbaginova@gmail.com

Магнитогорский государственный технический университет им. Г. И. НосоваРоссияNosov Magnitogorsk State Technical UniversitRussian Federation

Российский университет транспортаРоссияRussian University of TransportRussian Federation

2023

16082024

216119130

2024

Осинцев Н.А., Цыганов А.В., Рахмангулов А.Н., Багинова В.В.

Osintsev N.A., Tsyganov A.V., Rakhmangulov A.N., Baginova V.V.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://mirtr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2621

Представлены результаты анализа и сравнения наиболее распространенных в настоящее время контрейлерных систем, находящихся на стадиях как коммерческого использования, так разработки и тестирования. Сравнение выполнено с целью определения контрейлерной системы, отвечающей требованиям концепции устойчивого развития и обеспечивающей эффективное функционирование цепей поставок. Авторами впервые предложена методика многокритериальной оценки (MCDM) контрейлерных систем, учитывающая требования основных стейкхолдеров цепи поставок: грузовладельцев, перевозчиков и владельцев инфраструктуры. Анализ сформированной многокритериальной модели оценки контрейлерных систем выполнен с использованием методологического аппарата DEMATEL и MARCOS. Представлен расчетный пример ранжирования контрейлерных систем исходя из интересов стейкхолдеров цепей поставок. Выполнена проверка корректности полученных результатов другими MCDM-методами: TOPSIS, EDAS, MABAC иWASPAS. Проведены результаты оценки чувствительности результатов ранжирования контрейлерных систем при различных сценариях. Наивысшие оценки получили контрейлерные системы Flexiwaggon, Megaswing и Rolling Road. Предлагаемая методика рекомендуется для выработки рационально обоснованных управленческих решений, направленных на согласование технических и технологических параметров контрейлерных систем, а также унификацию интермодальных транспортных единиц для формирования устойчивых цепей поставок.

The results of analysis and comparison of the currently most common piggyback systems refer to those which are at the stages of both commercial operation and testing development. The comparison was made to determine a piggyback system that meets the requirements of the sustainable development concept and ensures the efficient functioning of supply chains. The authors are the first to propose a multi-criteria assessment methodology (MCDM) for piggyback systems that considers the requirements of main stakeholders of the supply chain: cargo owners, carriers and infrastructure owners. The analysis of the generated multi-criteria model for evaluating piggyback systems was carried out using the methodological apparatus of DEMATEL and MARCOS. A calculated example of ranking piggyback systems is based on the interests of supply chain stakeholders. The correctness of the results obtained was checked using other MCDM methods: TOPSIS, EDAS, MABAC and WASPAS. The results of assessing sensitivity of results of ranking piggyback systems were performed under various scenarios. The Flexiwaggon, Megaswing and Rolling Road piggyback systems received the highest scores. The proposed methodology is recommended for developing rationally based management decisions aimed at harmonising the technical and technological parameters of piggyback systems, as well as at the unification of intermodal transport units for development of sustainable supply chains.

транспортустойчивое развитиецепь поставокмультимодальная перевозкакомбинированная перевозкаинтермодальная перевозкаконтрейлерная системаMCDMDEMATELMARCOS

transportsustainable developmentsupply chainmultimodal transportationcombined transportationintermodal transportationpiggyback systemMCDMDEMATELMARCOS

исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23–21–00164, https:// rscf.ru/project/23–11–00164/.

the research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23–21–00164, https://rscf.ru/ project/23–11–00164/.

References1

Zhao, Xianbo; Ke, Yongjian; Zuo, Jian; Xiong, Wei; Wu, Peng. Evaluation of sustainable transport research in 2000–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, Vol. 256, 120404. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120404.

Aloui, A., Hamani, N., Derrouiche, R., Delahoche, L. Systematic literature review on collaborative sustainable transportation: Overview, analysis and perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2021, Vol. 9, 100291. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100291.

Osintsev, N., Tsyganov, A., Rakhmangulov, A., Sładkowski, A.Multi-criteria Assessment of Piggyback Systems in Sustainable Supply Chains. In: Sładkowski, A. (eds) Modern Trends and Research in Intermodal Transportation. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Vol 400. Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 451−559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–87120–8_10 [ограниченный доступ].

Osintsev, N., Tsyganov, A., Rakhmangulov, A., Sładkowski, A. Multi-criteria Assessment of Piggyback Systems in Sustainable Supply Chains. In: Sładkowski, A. (eds) Modern Trends and Research in Intermodal Transportation. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Vol. 400. Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 451–559. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87120-8_10 [restricted access].

Lehtinen, J., Bask, A. H.Analysis of business models for potential 3Mode transport corridor. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, Vol. 22, pp. 96–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.001.

Gharehgozli, A., Vries, H. de, Decrauw, S. The role of standardisation in European intermodal transportation. Maritime Business Review, 2019, Vol. 4 (2), pp. 151–168. DOI: 10.1108/MABR-09-2018-0038.

Gharehgozli, A., Vries, H. de, Decrauw, S.The role of standardisation in European intermodal transportation. Maritime Business Review, 2019, Vol. 4 (2), pp. 151–168. DOI: 10.1108/MABR-09-2018-0038.

Tsyganov, A. V., Osintsev, N. A. Systematization of rolling-stock parameters in piggyback systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, Vol. 709, 33010. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/709/3/033010.

Tsyganov A. V., Osintsev N. A. Systematization of rolling-stock parameters in piggyback systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020,Vol.709,33010.DOI : 10.1088/1757-899X/709/3/033010.

Rui Wang, Kai Yang, Lixing Yang, Ziyou Gao. Modeling and optimization of a road–rail intermodal transport system under uncertain information. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018, Vol. 72, pp. 423–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.04.022.

Krstić, M., Tadić, S., Elia, V., Massari, S., Farooq, M. U. Intermodal Terminal Subsystem Technology Selection Using Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model. Sustainability, 2023, Vol. 15 (4), 3427. DOI: 10.3390/su15043427.

Cong Li, Guang Yang, Xiaonian Sun. Transshipment Equipments for Road-Rail Intermodal Transport. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, Vol. 1065–1069, pp. 3377–3380. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1065-1069.3377.

Xinghan Chen, Tianshuai Zuo, Maoxiang Lang, Shiqi Li, Siyu Li. Integrated optimization of transfer station selection and train timetables for road-rail intermodal transport network. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2022, Vol. 165, 107929. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107929.

El Yaagoubi, A., Ferjani, A., Essaghir, Y., Sheikhahmadi, F., Abourraja, M. N., Boukachour, J., Baron, M.-L., Duvallet, C., Khodadad-Saryazdi, A. A logistic model for a french intermodal rail/road freight transportation system. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, Vol. 164, 102819. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102819.

El Yaagoubi, A., Ferjani, A., Essaghir, Y., Sheikhahmadi, F., Abourraja, M. N., Boukachour, J., Baron, M.-L., Duvallet, C., Khodadad-Saryazdi, A. Alogistic model for a french intermodal rail/road freight transportation system. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, Vol. 164, 102819. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102819.

Федорина А. В., Цыганов А. В. Комплексный подход к внедрению контрейлерных перевозок в России // Современные проблемы транспортного комплекса России. – 2015. – Т. 5. – № 1. – С. 21–28. EDN: VPWEDJ.

Fedorina, A. V., Tsyganov, A. V. An integrated approach to the implementation of piggyback transportation in Russia [Kompleksnyy podkhod k vnedreniyu kontreylernykh perevozok v Rossii]. Modern Problems of Russian Transport Complex, 2015, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 21–28. EDN: VPWEDJ.

Колик А. В. Комбинированные железнодорожноавтомобильные перевозки в цепях поставок. – М.: Изд-во «Техполиграфцентр», 2018. – 301 с. ISBN 978-5-94385-143-8.

Kolik, A. V. Combined rail and road transport in supply chains [Kombinirovannye zheleznodorozhnoavtomobil’nye perevozki v cepyah postavok]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo «Tekhpoligrafcentr», 2018, 301 p. ISBN 978-5-94385-143-8.

Crainic, T. G., Perboli, G., Rosano, M. Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, Vol. 270 (2), pp. 401–418. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.061.

Koohathongsumrit, N., Meethom, W. An integrated approach of fuzzy risk assessment model and data envelopment analysis for route selection in multimodal transportation networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 114342. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114342.

Koohathongsumrit, N., Meethom, W.An integrated approach of fuzzy risk assessment model and data envelopment analysis for route selection in multimodal transportation networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 114342. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114342.

Banasik, A., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., Vorst van der, J. G. A.J. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: A review. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2018, Vol. 30 (3), pp. 366–396. DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9263-5.

Banasik, A., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., Vorst van der, J. G. A. J.Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: Areview. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2018, Vol. 30 (3), pp. 366–396. DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9263-5.

Цыганов А. В., Осинцев Н. А., Рахмангулов А. Н., Зенкин А. А. Критерии устойчивости контрейлерной системы // Мир транспорта. – 2023. – № 5 (108). – С. 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-5-14.

Tsyganov, A. V., Osintsev, N. A., Rakhmangulov, A. N., Zenkin, A. A. Stability Criteria for a Piggyback System. World of Transport and Transportation, 2023, Vol. 21, Iss. 5 (108), pp. 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-5-14.

Gabus, A., Fontela, E. World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1972. pp. 1–8.

Gabus, A., Fontela, E.World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1972. pp. 1–8.

Sheng-Li, Si; Xiao-Yue, You; Hu-Chen, Liu; Zhang Ping. DEMATEL technique: a systematic review of the stateof-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, Vol. 2018, 3696457. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3696457.

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, Vol. 140, 106231. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231.

Ching-Lai, Hwang; Kwangsun, Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981, 270 p.

Ching-Lai, Hwang, Kwangsun, Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981, 270 p.

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica, 2015, Vol. 26, Iss. 3, pp. 435–451. DOI: 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57.

Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multiattributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, Vol. 42, Iss. 6, pp. 3016–3028. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057.

Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G.The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multiattributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, Vol. 42, Iss. 6, pp. 3016–3028. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2012, Vol. 122, Iss. 6, pp. 3–6. DOI: 10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.